
Hello everyone!
Today’s topics are: Help! – I Am an Assistant; Remembering Ron Wilson; Backpalm Gag Revelation; Last Card in Cards up the Sleeve – Backpalm Throw; Peer Review in Magic; On Fooling and Fascinating; Last Word by Marlo
These are The Magic Memories 230, gone online Sunday, August 2nd, 2026, at 0:07h sharp.
All The Magic Memories from 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025, including the Magic Advent Calendar from 2020, can be found HERE.
Help! – I Am an Assistant
I have had the following subject on the back burner for quite some time, for various reasons. It refers to the gala show at the French National Convention in Troyes in 2025, which I briefly mentioned in The Magic Memories 221.

The gala was excellent, and it was capably and enthusiastically emceed by a lady who was not a magicienne (the French word for a female magician), but whose background was in popular theater, vaudeville, and cabaret.
It was obvious that throughout her career she had learned how to handle demanding audiences. Her style was energetic and direct, which initially took the audience somewhat by surprise. However, they quickly accepted it as simply being her personality, and within a few minutes she had them in the palm of her hand.
As is customary in French cabaret, she occasionally sang and danced between acts, and she frequently left the stage to mingle with the audience, addressing individual spectators directly.
Now comes the rather unusual experience (at least for me!) that I would like to share with you, because it has some relevance for all of us who perform for live audiences, whether close-up or on stage.
During one of her interludes she began singing a rather frivolous chanson (you can read the lyrics at the beginning of the video), strolling through the audience, directing most of her attention to the gentlemen, occasionally stroking their hair in a manner typical of French cabaret.
At one point she stopped beside me—I happened to be sitting on the aisle—and somehow persuaded me to stand up. I honestly cannot remember exactly how she did it, but she did it so naturally that before I knew it she had one arm around me, a microphone in the other hand, and we were dancing together.
While dancing she touched me… well… almost everywhere, and at the end she gave me a kiss.
As a picture is worth a thousand words, you may enjoy the thirty-second video my malicious friend Juan Luis Rubiales recorded and later sent me. To watch it, CLICK HERE.
The situation was doubly amusing because virtually everyone at the convention knew me. In addition, I was serving as one of the judges for the French National Competition, which made me even more visible. Furthermore, many people consider me to be a rather serious person (which is only half true…), making the whole episode all the more entertaining for everyone else.
Although my feelings at the time were decidedly mixed, I would not have wanted to miss the experience.
Not only has it provided material for this installment of The Magic Memories, but it has also prompted me to reflect once again on how we deal with assisting spectators, whether at the table, on stage, or—as in this case—out in the audience.
Like most men, I probably have less of a problem being touched by a woman than many women would have being touched by a man in the same circumstances. What briefly confused me was not that she was touching me, but rather how much—and where—I was supposed to touch her while dancing. It was an unexpected social dilemma.
The incident also made me smile afterward, because I could not help imagining the reverse situation. Suppose I had been the emcee, walked into the audience, invited a lady to dance with me, held her close, and concluded by giving her a kiss. I suspect the reaction might have been rather different—especially had her husband been sitting next to her…
I have written at length about managing assisting spectators in Stand-Up Card Magic (“Chapter 2: Spectator Management,” p. 23), so I shall not repeat myself here.
Instead, I would like to leave you with just one quotation:
“Do to others as you would have them do to you.” —Luke 6:31 (NIV)
This is the classic biblical formulation of the Golden Rule. In contemporary language we might simply say:
“Treat others as you would like them to treat you.”
Really, that is all we need to know—and to act upon—is it not?
PS: Why not ask AI the following question?
“I am a professional magician. Give me ten iron rules to follow when choosing and interacting with an assisting spectator.”
See what you get…
(If you are curious to know what AI answered to my prompt, you will find it HERE.)
Remembering Ron Wilson (1926–2010)
The very first time I met Ron Wilson was at the bar of the Kennedy Hotel in London, on the occasion of Ron MacMillan’s One-Day Convention in 1979. I had just turned twenty. You can read the story of how I met Ron and Dai Vernon in The Magic Memories 20 (May 16, 2021).

I met Ron again at several conventions in the United States, as well as at various FISM conventions, although I can no longer recall the details. My fondest memories, however, are from the occasions when I was booked to perform at the Magic Castle. I particularly remember sitting with Ron, discussing magic for what seemed like hours. As always, he was generous with his time, encouraging in his comments, and genuinely kind.
Fortunately for us, Richard Kaufman preserved most of Ron’s professional repertoire in The Uncanny Scot – Ron Wilson(Kaufman & Greenberg, USA, 1987), enriching the explanations with amusing anecdotes and perceptive stories that reveal the man behind the magic.
If you can get hold of a copy—and I recommend that you do, especially if you perform professionally—here are just a few of the many items I marked when I first studied the book:
- “A Conversation with Ron Wilson” (p. 11). I have always enjoyed interviews because they reveal the person behind the tricks. In my opinion, every book devoted to the work of a magician should include at least a short biographical chapter that tells us something about the artist’s life, convictions, and working philosophy.
- “The Highland Hop” (p. 20). An excellent effect.
- “Riffle-up Lift” (p. 34). Ron’s handling of the Double Turnover. Kaufman describes holding the deck face down in Dealing Position and riffling the top card off at its outer left corner. As the right thumb and forefinger reach for that card, providing cover, the left thumb releases a second card so that the right hand actually takes two.Here is a small handling detail that makes the move both easier and more deceptive. As your right thumb contacts the back of the first card at its outer left corner, press it gently back against the deck for a brief instant. At precisely that moment, the left thumb releases the second card. This tiny action provides better cover and makes the pickup almost automatic. Rather than lifting the double to display it—which makes replacing it somewhat awkward—immediately turn the two cards end over end, replace them on the deck while retaining a little-finger break. After showing the face of the card, making sure everyone has had a good look (!), turn it face down again using Cliff Green’s Double Lift, which I described in Secret Agenda (“January 13 • A Delicate Double Lift”) and which originally appeared in Green’s Professional Card Magic (p. 17).
- “A Hand to Remember” (p. 92). My original margin note simply reads: “Commercial effect—very good!”
- “Confabulous!” (p. 98). Ron’s version of Al Koran’s classic “Confabulation.” It served me admirably during a four-day trade show in Milan, where I presented six performances a day for Autodesk, the company that developed the computer-aided design software AutoCAD.
BONUS: Numerous anecdotes are interspersed throughout the text, adding greatly to the warmth and charm of the book.
DOUBLE BONUS: Since both Ron Wilson and Bascom Jones have been gone for many years, I have taken the liberty of scanning for you a delightful two-page essay Ron wrote, “Two-dozen Tips on Presentation,” originally published in Bascom Jones’s Magick No. 73 (April 1973).
I never had the pleasure of meeting Bascom Jones in person, but if he was even half as kind and generous as Ron, I am sure they would both approve of my sharing it with you. Please accept it with the compliments of all three of us – CLICK HERE.
Backpalm Gag Revelation
This is a Bit of Business I came up with to dramatize the transformation of a card, e.g., when you apparently find the wrong card that you then magically transform into the selected card.
The idea has an open architecture and can be adapted in many ways. Here is an example of how this could be played:
Have a card selected, shown to everyone (never forget this!), and then replaced and controlled to the top of deck.
Spread the cards between your hands and have another spectator take a card, saying she will by mere intuition pick the previously selected and lost card – what a claim!
She will pick an indifferent card (unless she insists on taking the top card, something which rarely but occasionally happens… in this case make the most out of the situation).
(Lateral thought: To practice the Classic Force, you could try to force the card, which as a consequence even spares you the control…)
Assuming she took an indifferent card: Show the wrong card. As the audience reacts, top change the card, still holding it with the back toward the audience.
Look at the face of the card yourself, without letting anyone else see it, and miscall the card, “The XY ist not your card? What is your card then?”
When the spectator names the card, apparently throw the card into the air, were it “disappears”; in reality you backpalm it, “Oh, so I don’t need this one anymore…”
Wait two seconds, then reach into the air and reproduce the backpalmed card, still holding it with its back toward the audience, “How about this one then…”
Turn the card with its face toward the audience as you name the correct card.
As simple as this reads, it gets a great reaction.
(RG, May 2026, in a session with Tino Plaz; the idea came to me on the spur of the moment)
PS: As I am writing this down, it occurred to me that this Bit of Business could also be a solution to the eternal problem of the “last card” in any “Cards up the Sleeve” routine, to wit:
Last Card in Cards up the Sleeve – Backpalm Throw
Assuming the cards are held in left hand Dealing Position and pass up your left sleeve, and are then extracted from inside your jacket from the left shoulder:
Take the last card with the right hand, show it, turn right, then apparently throw the card into the air, really backpalming it.
With your eyes look up and follow the invisible path of the card from your right hand in a large arc to your left shoulder. Synchronize the movement of your head and eyes with your right hand that moves in a smaller arc from the space the card “vanished” to your left shoulder, at all times keeping the palm of your right hand toward the audience. You will be surprised at how easy this is, and it looks good, too.
Plunge your right hand, with the finger tips first, into the jacket, going directly to your left shoulder inside the jacket, and in the process bring the card to the fingertips, as if producing the card. Slowly pull your hand from below the jacket and show that the last card has travelled. (Hold the card perpendicular to the hand!)
(Roberto Giobbi, 17th July 2026)
Peer Review in Magic
The term peer review refers to a scientific quality-control process. Before a scholarly paper or study is published, it is evaluated by independent experts in the same field—the so-called peers.
How does the process work?
-
Initial Assessment. After a paper has been submitted to a scholarly journal, the editors evaluate whether it is relevant to the publication and whether it meets the formal requirements.
-
Review. Subject-matter experts then examine the manuscript critically, looking for methodological flaws, logical inconsistencies, and assessing the originality and significance of the work.
-
Decision. Based on their reports, the reviewers recommend that the paper be accepted, rejected, or revised. Many journals use a double-blind peer review system, in which the authors do not know who reviewed their work, and the reviewers do not know who wrote it.
Why is it important?
The peer-review process helps ensure that only research that is methodologically sound, well documented, and capable of withstanding critical scrutiny is published. Articles that have successfully passed this process—often referred to as peer-reviewed—are generally regarded as reliable and authoritative sources within the academic community.
RG Comment
Possibly in a “lighter” version, this is something we could profitably adopt in magic publications as well, but especially in periodicals… Even agreeing on a consistent terminology would be a major step forward.
To be thought about.
On Fooling and Fascinating
In an email of July 25th, 2026, Chris Gartner asked me:
I recently listened to your podcast conversation with Michael Close with great interest (CLICK HERE).
I was reviewing my notes from many years ago and I had written something about Vernon. Did Vernon say that if an effect fools you, that alone shouldn’t be the primary reason to learn and perform it ?
I would appreciate it if you could point me toward where I can find more information about this in print.
Here is my answer, for the time being:
As far as I can remember, I never read or heard a quotation with exactly this wording. But with that much material published on Dai Vernon, who knows…
However, the thought that Chris has in his notes in my opinion echoes in a concise form what Vernon occasionally discussed when he talked about magic in his interviews and lectures.
Knowing that AI has access to a lot more of specific information, I prompted this:
Where did Dai Vernon say something to the effect that that if a magic trick fools you, that alone shouldn’t be the primary reason to learn and perform it ?
AI answers:
I don’t think there’s a canonical Dai Vernon quote with exactly that wording. However, the sentiment you describe is very much associated with Vernon’s philosophy, and it appears in several places in paraphrased form rather than as a single famous quotation.
The closest sources I’d investigate are:
The Vernon Chronicles: He Fooled Houdini
This is probably the strongest candidate.
Volume 4 contains chapters like “Effects Defined,” “Great Tricks,” “What’s Wrong With Magic,” and “Attack on Magic.”
Vernon repeatedly argues that an effect should be worth presenting because it is artistically strong, clear, and magical—not merely because the method is deceptive.
He distinguishes between a clever trick and a great magical effect.
The Vernon Touch
His monthly columns from 1968–1990 often return to the idea that magicians become enamored with methods instead of effects.
Vernon frequently criticized tricks that fooled magicians but lacked impact for lay audiences.
The Vernon Revelations videos
During the informal sessions Vernon comments several times that magicians are attracted to difficult or ingenious methods for the wrong reasons, and that audiences don’t care how clever the method is.
The underlying Vernon idea is usually expressed in comments such as:
Don’t do a trick just because it fools magicians.
The effect is what matters—not the method.
A trick should be worth performing even if the secret weren’t especially clever.
Choose effects because they’re strong for the audience, not because they’re difficult or deceptive.
Those are paraphrases of themes he returned to again and again, rather than verbatim quotations.
One quote that points in the same direction
Vernon’s famous line:
“Confusion isn’t magic.”is perhaps the best-known expression of the broader philosophy. He believed the audience should experience a clear, impossible effect, not simply be baffled by an inscrutable procedure.
My guess
The specific wording you remember—“If a trick fools you, that alone isn’t a sufficient reason to learn or perform it”—sounds like something that was attributed to Vernon by a student or author (such as Stephen Minch, Michael Ammar, John Carney, or David Ben) rather than a direct quotation from Vernon himself. It’s very much in his voice, but I don’t think it’s a documented verbatim quote.
So far AI, and it answers Chris Gartner’s question quite well, don’t you think so?
This is, by the way, an interesting example that shows how AI can be helpful, but you must know your subject and carefully reread the answer and edit it if necessary (I only had to do a few edits).
To what AI wrote I would add that Vernon had an excellent understanding of the essence of magic, and he knew the difference between an amateur and a professional (he was both!).
My own experience when I lecture for a club or at a convention, is that a trick that is novel and fools them receives more attention and praise than a well-thought out performance piece where the attendants (think they) know how it is done.
I remember that years ago I did a lecture where I first performed five tricks, and then asked the attendants by vote which three they want me to discuss.
Invariably the three “foolers” were picked, and the two which I thought were really interesting were ignored (“Tutti Frutti”, my bill in lemon routine, and “Sponge and Bowl Routine”).
Talking to the people after the lecture, only a few real performers said that they would have preferred me to discuss the other two items instead; I agree with them.
Why this is so, is worth of a lengthier discussion…
Last Word
“Ed Marlo offers some great advice. He says that new moves are not needed. Just a lot more practice on the old ones.”
(from: Genii, DEC 1966 in Charlie Miller’s column, p. 168)
Very best wishes,
Roberto Giobbi
























































































