
Hello everyone!
Today’s topics are: German Cardworkshop (CWS) 2026 (LePaul, Pareras, Apparatus Card Magic, T&R Card); The Card Magic of Paul LePaul; TTTCBE; Burger Wisdom
These are The Magic Memories 225, gone online Sunday, March 1st, 2026, at 0:07h sharp.
All The Magic Memories from 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025, including the Magic Advent Calendar from 2020, can be found HERE.
German Cardworkshop (CWS)
This year the German Cardworkshop (CWS) celebrated its 60th edition (!!!), once again at Stephan Kirschbaum’s Wundermanufaktur, from FEB 15-17, three days of full immersion into the infinite universe of card magic.

I have reported about the CWS before – its history, activities, and members – several times in these The Magic Memories, e.g., see The Magic Memories 164 and 217… and more.
Life & Work of Paul LePaul Life & Work of Gabi Pareras Card Magic With Apparatus Torn & Restored Card
Since I have dealt with the CWS extensively in the above-mentioned blogs, I will just make a few comments on this year’s topics.
Paul LePaul (1900-1958)
This subject was ably prepared and presented by Denis Behr and Lorenz Schär (plus a little contribution of mine – see below), who did an extraordinary job, not only content-wise, but also knew how to time their presentations.

You have to consider that all these presentations are given for the first and probably last time, with no or little occasion of rehearsal. So, to present relevant content in a limited time is not an easy task.
Anyway, Denis and Lorenz wrote a remarkable paper on LePaul, with lots of information most of us – even the “experts” – did not have, great photos, and some rare video footage, with the help of Gary Plants and Bill Kalush.
To read and download the PDF they prepared, you should subscribe to Denis’ Newsletter – if you haven not already done so, I recommend you do, as it appears only sporadically, and when it does it invariable contains noteworthy information.
To get to the current Newsletter that contains the link to download the PDF-paper on LePaul CLICK HERE, to subscribe to the Newsletter CLICK HERE.
Gabi Pareras (1965-2020)

To talk about the life and work of Gabi Pareras would take weeks (and more…), as he was one of the true geniuses of our art.
However, Vicente Noguera, Marc Haufer, and Moritz Müller managed to give a good overview of the person and his approach to magic, through biographical information, anecdotes, tricks, techniques, and several interesting video clips.



All was supplemented by various others of the group performing material of Gabi’s and discussing it.
This certainly was a very challenging subject to study and present, and I felt it was very well done. Due to time-restrictions a part that the group had prepared could not be presented. However, it was decided that the subject be continued at the 61st CWS in 2027.
I had prepare a one-hour talk about my several personal meetings and sessions I had with Gabi in the past twenty-plus years, with several private and unpublished notes, but again unfortunately time-restrictions did not allow this to happen… so, this information will remain “underground”.

Card Magic With Apparatus
This presentation was headed by Wolfgang Moser, with contributions of Magic Christian, Tino Plaz and others.
Wolfgang wrote a detailed and informative paper on the subject that we hope to make available to the community in the near future.

Although one might think that this was more of a talk on the history of apparatus, it was only partially so.
Certainly, the big times of using apparatus in card magic is over, but if you plunge into the subject you will find that “apparatus” in the larger and stricter sense of the term are still being used nowadays to great success.
Wolfgang Moser gave us a concise and informative overview of classic apparatus used for card tricks, performing and explaining some of the most important ones.
He also discussed how he has lately taken a deep interest in 3D-printing, and to the delight and surprise of all he performed a reconstructed devil’s head, where a chosen card comes out of the devil’s mouth!
This piece of apparatus has been used by several in the past, possibly best known as “Head of Mephistopheles” and described by Professor Hoffmann in his Modern Magic, where it goes by the name of “Demon Head”.

As for history: The photo below shows Magic Christian discussing Hofzinser’s Card Box, which is really a box for tobacco and which brings up the subject of how to make a piece of apparatus meaningful in the setting of what is being performed.

In this context Christian reminded us of one of Hofzinser’s most important dictums: “Alle Handlungen und heimliche Handgriffe müssen immer einen Grund haben – There always has to be a reason for all actions and moves.” This is certainly very much in line with what Dai Vernon postulated as “be natural”.
The card box depicted in the photos below is from the collection of Volker Huber; this box can be reloaded twice, thus allowing three changes… not such a bad idea.
Torn & Restored Card
Another huge subject, this one being presided over by Tom Merten and Axel Hecklau, but as always several others intervened with short contributions.
Tom put a lot of time and enthusiasm into researching and presenting the subject, which is admittedly vast.
Such a topic brings up the question of how much time you should spend presenting what already exists and how much discussing and presenting innovation.
Few know better than me how difficult it is to get everything you know under one hat, and then present it in as concise a manner as possible.
In the past I have tried to overcome such a problem by concentrating on four or five items that exemplify relevant and different concepts, and then spend the rest of the time analyzing them.
There is no doubt that this lengthy presentation put a lot of excellent material on the table, but it also went way beyond the allotted time, thus taking away time from other presentations.
This problem of balancing content and respecting a given time frame is certainly one of the things that need to be addressed in future meetings… actually, to be frank, it is the problem of any meeting of this type.

The over-talented Axel Hecklau, who is as much a creator as a performer, had some great contributions, some of which he shares in his lectures – so, if you have a chance to book him for your club, or see him at a convention, do not miss it.
Sessions… And More
Below a few impressions form the “unofficial” part of this year’s CWS:



As for next year, see if you can find out what the subjects will be from those proposed…

Last but not least everyone was thankful for Jörg Alexander organizing the event, and Stephan Kirschbaum hosting it at his unique theatre.
BTW: If you visit Germany you should stop by Nürnberg, which has a beautiful historical old town, but above all take the opportunity to watch Stephan Kirschbaum’s show at his Wundermanufaktur – I did the night before the CWS and was enthralled by the entire experience!
On The Card Magic of Paul LePaul (1949)
My contribution was a 90-minutes presentation discussing LePaul’s book The Card Magic of LePaul, focussing on his techniques, tricks, presentations and a little theory.
In the first part I dealt with a dozen of LePaul’s techniques that seem to me to be the most useful for the modern cardician, in the second part I discussed a selection of tricks and performed some of them.
Below I will reproduce what I think is most useful from the second part, the tricks.

In order to understand and enjoy my comments in this subchapter it is best to do so with the book or the PDF in front of you, and follow my comments with cards in hands.
You can get the PDF of the book for a mere $9 from lybrary.com HERE instantly and very easily, but also the book is still available, e.g., HERE, or from Amazon.
Also, I recommend that you read Denis’ and Lorenz’ paper in Denis’ latest Newsletter on who LePaul as a person and artist was, as it will put the following into the correct perspective.
And remember that the book is from 1949!
Generalities
LePaul was no intellectual, but an inspired intuitive artist.
Nonetheless, there are a few places in the book which deal with personal thoughts, introspective insights, and conceptual ideas, all gained from hard-won professional experience.
Read the “Preface” on p. 21 that sets the tone for the book, as well as his short take on “Simplicity” on p. 129, which is very practical advice and valid to this day, although so much has changed since LePaul flourished.
Didactical Layout and Photos
You might be surprised if I tell you that LePaul’s book, along with a Swiss cookbook (Betty Bossi), was an important influence on the layout of Card College.
The photo below shows a double-page from the book, and you can see how many photos there are, and how they are layouted alongside the text that references them. This is really like a script, and it facilitates learning tremendously if you do not have to turn the page each time a photo is referenced (I am reminded of the book of a very famous cardician where you occasionally had to turn not one but two pages to get to the photo mentioned in the text…).

Although for Card College I had decided to go for pencil drawings rather than photos, because drawings can selectively show what is important, the photos taken from LePaul’s own hands and cards (beautiful Bicycle Fan Backs!) are certainly of historical value, and also they are very good (unfortunately, only in the first two editions, later they reproduced very badly).
p. 131: How Close Can You Watch)
This is arguably the most straightforward Color Changing Deck, and it is a good one to start a program.
LePaul does not give presentational ideas for most of the tricks described, but here he does, and you can use it as a theme for an entire program.
Furthermore this short and visual trick allows you to elegantly introduce a stacked deck, of which the audience believes that it has been previously shuffled by them – this is akin to my “The No-switch Deck Switch”, a concept that I introduced in The Art of Switching Decks.
This trick has more to it than meets the eye…
p. 143: The Substitution Envelope Mystery
I have been using this for years in my professional work when performing at tables and can vouch for its effectiveness. I have even included a slight variation in handling with a few extra thoughts in a set of lectures notes of mine, which appeared in German language, but I have asked ChatGPT to translate it for you. The writing was an experiment, as I wrote the text as if it had been notes taken by someone assisting at the lecture – you may find this a bit strange to read…
Anyway, HERE is the German original, and HERE the English tradition (for the illustrations you will have to reference the German text).
p. 155: An Unexpected Climax
This has a lovely dramatic construction: 1. interesting premise, 2. conflict with an apparent mistake, 3. unexpected resolution.
The Card Switch using a double card and the Gambler’s Cop, which LePaul discusses in the chapter previous to the trick, is very interesting and useful. You may want to see how I use this technique in “A Sure Bet” in Card College Volume 3, p. 565, but above all see my updated handling in the video course Card College 3&4 – Personal Instruction, “Lesson 26: Controls Part 2” – this is simply a great trick (I apologize for the obvious immodesty).
Also, LePaul’s trick allows for a deck switch that will come undetected even for experts (it is similar to the “Partagas Switch” from The Art of Switching Decks, but even more subtle since you switch in two half-decks.
p. 159: A Perfect Stop Trick
You might find this more of academic interest, but the use of the Gambler’s Cop is, well, unexpected…
p. 175: A Deft Delusion
What a great solution for the classic “Everybody’s Card” plot. Note one of the first descriptions of the Double Undercut.
However, the technical procedure will keep most from performing this, although a few changes in handling will make this very practical.
First, instead of using the most eccentric switching technique of LePaul’s, why not substitute this with a Glide from End Grip?
And here is a simplified version you may want to try, in telegram style: Ask spectator to join you, show him a card (e.g., 2H) taking care no-one else sees it, and place in trousers pocket, but palm out and add back on top of deck.
As you shuffle 2H to bottom, explain that 3 spectators will each choose a card. Do Hindu Shuffle Force on S1 by shuffling off max. one third of the deck, he remembers 2H. Continue shuffling deck and do Hindu Shuffle Force on S2 shuffling off another ca. third of deck, he remembers 2H. Go to S3 and continue Hindu Shuffle Force, so he also remembers 2H. If correctly handled, it will look as if S1 has remembered a card in the lower third, S2 in the center, and S3 in the top third (see Stand-up Card Magic, “The Hindu Shuffle Force – Forcing Multiple Cards With a Hindu Shuffle”, p. 68).
As you remind the audience that at the beginning you placed one card in your pocket, palm 2H in your right hand and show it to be the card you placed in pocket (only show back, of course!), then replace in pocket (your assistant may see the card, though).
Now proceed as per LePaul: Have all three spectators stand up and on your count of “one-two-three” all shout out their card – they will all shout, “Two of Hearts!” An idea by Karlheinz Ritter, one of the founding members of the CWS (!), is to do this in three phases: first, all shout the color (red or black), second, all shout the suit (heart or diamond), third all shout the value (in this case “two”). I have not tried this yet, but it seems an interesting approach to dramatize the simultaneous shouting.
Repeat the name of the card, and that they all thought of the same card – in itself an impossibility – and then show that this is not only impossible, it is a miracle, since it is the card you had in your pocket to begin with (ask assisting spectator who saw the card to name it before you take it from pocket)!
p. 193: Transposition of the Four Aces
I have never seen anyone do this, and all of us who have not are wrong!
This is a beautiful minor trick that can be done once the Aces have been brought into play.
If you read the brief description you will probably wince at the Turnover Pass, which is indeed breaking a butterfly on a wheel.
However, for any advanced card handler it should pose no problem to replace LePaul’s heavy-duty Turnover Pass with a simpler and above all clearer method. Let us see what you can come up with 🙂 Because if you do, you can follow the rest as described and you have a little gem at hand.
p. 199: The Hand-picked Aces
Here is another piece that has a captivating presentational premise, taking decisions.
Try the Multiple Fan Control a few times, and you will see that this harbors a practical concept adaptable to several other situations.
Also, the pyramid configuration of the cards is interesting – Jerry Andrus used similar ideas: rather than dealing cards in a row or in packets, create “designs” with them. Many a trick can be made more intriguing by using this ploy.
Like “Transposition of the Four Aces” this is a minor trick that fits nicely as an introduction to a more elaborate Four Ace Trick.
p. 207: The Gymnastic Aces
Arguably the most practical quick trick in the book that will hold its own even today, simply one of the greatest ways to produce the Aces, or any card (see my use in a routine “The Acrobatic Aces” in Card College Volume 3, p. 694).
If you cannot control the outcome, reread the instruction carefully, especially: “A sharp, whip-like shake…”
Nice to use in a multiple card revelation routine, also as a morphological strategy to prepare for a an upcoming trick by using the Faro to get into a set-up…
And John Carney has a lovely take on it by producing a wrong card as the fourth card, e.g., a Five, and then counting down five cards to reveal the fourth and last Ace.
This apparently simple item teaches us that similar to fractals there is something bigger hidden in everything small…
p. 213: Cards in Sealed Envelope
This has to be the book’s blockbuster, a trick that has influenced many cardicians to come up with endless variations, some brilliant, some less…
I could give a lecture on this one item, but will limit myself to a few comments:
Although the description does not mention a wallet, we know that LePaul did use one, at least on occasions.
Interesting to note that “wallet” in German is “Brieftasche” (pocket or container for letters), in Italian “portafoglio” (container of sheets of paper), in French “portefeuille” (same as Italian), in Spanish “cartera” (brief for container of paper) ; in English there is also the term “pocket book” being used, which comes close to the latin-based languages.
In all cases the “wallet” or “pocket book” refers to an object from the 18th and 19th century that was made to carry one’s letters and valuable papers, and later paper money.
Therefore, it makes perfect sense to carry envelopes in a wallet-type container, at least it did in former times.
But to understand a technique, a trick, or a presentation, it is very useful to dwell in its origin. Even if you come to the conclusion that in modern times it cannot be done as originally thought up, it will at least make you think about how to adapt the idea to the present times.
And make no mistake: Using a wallet – even if the envelopes are only placed within the folds of the wallet, not necessarily in a zippered compartment – greatly increases the impact of the effect.
Another issue is the type and preparation of the envelope set. Since this is getting lengthy, I will simply refer you to my treatment of the problem in Card College Volume 5, “On the LePaul Envelope Set”, p. 1367.
If you have the book, also check Jesús Etcheverry’s volume 3 of the Ascanio books, and there “Freddy Fah’s Wallet”, which is a very brief description of a trick Ascanio showed me. The version he did for me, and which I wrote down but never published, but will report here only roughly, consisted in secretly reversing four x-cards in the deck while the spectator signed the Aces. Ascanio would then insert the signed Aces face up in the face-down fan, and control the Aces to the bottom. The deck was then farmed twice, distributing the x-cards in the deck as the Aces where bottom-palmed in his left hand. He would then ribbon-spread the deck face up, revealing four-face down cards in the spread, this being an Action of Apparent Continuity.
Meanwhile he would load the Aces in the envelope set inside his wallet, which he took out, tapped the spread four times, then showing the face-down cards to be x-cards, and finally revealing the Aces inside the envelope and wallet.
Interesting to note that LePaul first reveals the Aces, and only afterward the reversed cards in the spread. He also does this on other occasions, e.g., in “The Hand-picked Aces” mentioned above.
Food for thought…
TTTCBE
I am currently revising my Ask Roberto project completely, with the intention of publishing it as a really well-made book through Vanishing Inc.; tentative scheduled launch being The Sessionconvention in London, January 2027.
As I was editing Tim Gaffney’s question on TTTCBE, I reread one of the solutions I gave and that I had completely forgotten. I think it is very practical, and I have never seen anyone do it this way, so assume the idea is mine (Denis will let me know if it is not🙂).
Since I, the author, forgot about it, I assume that you, the reader (if you have Ask Roberto at all), will be glad to be reminded. So, here is the idea in brevis:
What I occasionally do is keep the force card back in the box. After the spectator has shuffled the deck, which is minus one card (the one in the box), I say that we will put the deck in the box so nobody can tamper with it – I then insert the deck below the card already secreted in the box, making it the top card of the now completed deck.
I introduce a Positive Insertion by showing the prediction, then I repeat that the spectator has herself shuffled the cards, that she has herself cut the deck, and that she shall now herself take the deck out of the box. The audience will hopefully implicitly believe that she herself put it into the box. When the top card then matches the prediction, it is, well, a very good effect. Sometimes we think too far…
Burger Wisdom
In an interview Michael Close conducted with Dr. Larry Hass in 2022 (Conversations With Close – listen HERE), Hass quotes Eugene Burger having said about the subject of whether to sit or stand when doing close-up at a table:
Sit if you can, stand if you must, stroll only if necessary. – Eugene Burger
Corrigenda
. , ; : – (/)!? abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
This blog has only been proof-read in a cursory manner, leaving several mistakes and omissions. Please feel free to delete or add whatever is necessary to make it look good; use any of the characters above to do so, thank you!
Very best wishes,
Roberto Giobbi









































































